E X T O X N E T
Extension Toxicology
Network
Toxicology Information
Briefs
A Pesticide Information Project of Cooperative Extension
Offices of Cornell University, Oregon State University, the
University of Idaho, and the University of California at Davis
and the Institute for Environmental Toxicology, Michigan State
University. Major support and funding was provided by the
USDA/Extension Service/National Agricultural Pesticide Impact
Assessment Program.
EXTOXNET primary files maintained and archived at Oregon State
University
January, 1989
STANDARDS
INTRODUCTION
Persons interested in the issues surrounding exposure to
pesticides (or other chemicals) in either the occupational or
environmental context find that exposure levels are expressed in
relation to some standard. Unless the individual is familiar with
both the science of the chemical and the regulatory process the
meaning is often not apparent, particularly when the standard is
referred to by its acronym. This compilation is intended to be of
assistance by identifying the acronym and providing a definition.
I. ACRONYMS AND TERMS
- Action Level
The level of exposure at which certain provisions of the
standards must be initiated, such as periodic
measurements of employees, and medical surveillance (if
appropriate for the particular substance.)
- ADI, Acceptable daily intake
An estimate of acceptable daily dietary exposure which is
derived from a no observed effect level (NOEL) and a
safety factor.
- BEI, Biological exposure indices
A measure of the amount of chemical absorbed into the
body.
- CFR, Code of federal regulations
A codification of the general and permanent rules
published in the Federal Register by the Executive
departments and agencies of the Federal Government.
- Contaminant
Any physical, chemical, biological, or radiological
substance in water.
- DWEL, Drinking water equivalent level
The medium-specific exposure which is interpreted to be
protective for non-carcinogenic end-points of toxicity
over a lifetime of exposure. Medium refers to the
substrate, i.e., drinking water, and the standard assumes
lOO% of the exposure is from that medium.
- GRGL, Groundwater residue guidance level
The residue level at which no known or anticipated
adverse effects on health of persons may occur, including
an adequate margin of safety.
- HA, Health advisory
Non-regulatory information on health effects, analytical
methodology and treatment technology that would be useful
in dealing with contamination of drinking water.
Developed from data describing non-carcinogenic
end-points of toxicity.
- HERP, Human exposure dose/rodent potency dose
Index of possible hazard where human exposure (daily
lifetime dose in mg/kg) is expressed as a percentage of
the rodent TD50 (toxic dose affecting 50% of the
population) dose (in mg/kg) for a given carcinogen.
- IDLH, Immediately dangerous to life and health
Represents a maximum concentration from which, in the
event of respirator failure, one could escape within 30
minutes without experiencing any escape-impairing or
irreversible health effects.
- LEL, Lowest effect level
(See LOAEL)
- LOAEL, Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (also LEL and
LOEL)
In a series of dose levels tested, it is the lowest level
at which an effect (adverse) is observed in the species
tested.
- LOEL, Lowest-observed-effect level (See LOAEL)
- MAC, Maximum allowable concentrations
Used in industrial toxicology to define permissible
levels of exposure to chemicals.
- MCL, Maximum contaminant level
The maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water
which is delivered to any user of a public water system.
MCL levels take into account feasibility and cost but are
set as close as possible to the level at which no adverse
health effects occur.
- MCL Goal, Maximum contaminant level goal
The level at which no known or anticipated adverse
effects on the health of persons occur and which allows
an adequate margin of safety. MCL goals and MCLs for each
contaminant must be set simultaneously. RMCLs set prior
to 1986 now are treated as MCL goals.
- MPC, Maximum permissible concentration
Used to recommend maximal levels of uranium compounds in
drinking water.
- MRL, Minimal Risk Level
An estimate of daily human exposure to a chemical that is
likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious
effects (noncancerous) over a specified duration of
exposure.
- NEL, No-effect level
(See NOAEL)
- NOAEL, No-observed-adverse-effect-level (also NEL, NOEL)
In a series of dose levels tested, it is the highest
level at which no effect is observed, i.e., safe, in the
species tested.
- NOEL, No-observed-effect-level
(See NOAEL)
- PEL, Permissible exposure limit
An OSHA standard which is subject specific and has the
supporting documentation for promulgation and enforcement
of occupational health regulations. An allowable exposure
level in the workplace air averaged over an eight-hour
shift.
- PHI, Preharvest interval
The period between the last application of a pesticide
and harvest of the crop.
- Q*, Oncogenic potency
Potency factor derived from mathematical models that
extrapolate from data derived from animal experiments to
estimate human cancer risk. The Q* value is a
probabilistic estimate of the upper bound on incidence of
extra instances of tumor formation in humans that can be
expected following dietary ingestions, or exposure by
other routes, of a given level of a particular chemical
over a 70-year human lifetime.
- RDA, Recommended dietary allowance
National Academy of Science allowance intended to provide
for individual variations among most normal persons as
they live in the United States under usual environmental
stress.
- RfD, Reference Dose
An estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order
of magnitude) of the daily exposure of the human
population to a potential hazard that is likely to be
without risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime.
The RfD is operationally derived from the NOAEL (from
animal and human studies) by a consistent application of
uncertainty factors that reflect various types of data
used to estimate RfDs and an additional modifying factor,
which is based on a professional judgment of the entire
database on the chemical. The RfDs are not applicable to
nonthreshold effects such as cancer.
- RMCL, Recommended maximum contaminant level
RMCLs are set by rule for any contaminant in drinking
water which may adversely affect the health of persons.
RMCLs are set at a level at which no known or anticipated
adverse health effects occur with an adequate margin of
safety. RMCLs set prior to MCLs for each contaminant.
Note: the term RMCL was replaced by the term "MCL
goal" in the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of
1986.
- RRfD, Risk reference dose
Estimate of daily exposure to the human population which
appears to be without appreciable risk of deleterious
effects over a lifetime of exposure.
- SIC, Surveillance index classification
Five classifications used by FDA to categorize health
hazards.
- Class I _ high health hazard on a toxicological
basis.
- Class II _ evidence of possible high risk of
toxic effects.
- Class III _ moderate profile based on weighing
both toxicity and dietary exposure factors.
- Class IV _ low hazard potential, justifies only
intelligence related monitoring effects.
- Class V _ little potential hazard due to low
toxicity or minimal possible exposure.
- SNARL, Suggested no adverse response level
A level protective of a 70 kg adult consuming 2 liters of
water per day and for whom drinking water is assumed to
contribute 20% of the daily exposure to the chemical
residue.
- TADI, Temporary acceptable daily intake
(See ADI)
- TAS, Tolerance Assessment System
The TAS joins pesticide-commodity tolerance data with
food consumption data to estimate possible chemical
intake levels.
- TLV, Threshold limit value
Refers to airborne concentrations of substances and
represents conditions under which it is believed that
nearly all workers may be unaffected.
- TLV-C, Ceiling
The concentration that should not be exceeded during any
part of the working exposure.
- TLV-STEL, Short term exposure limit
Supplements the TWA where there are recognized acute
effects from a substance whose toxic effects are
primarily of a chronic nature. A 15- minute TWA not to be
exceeded at any time.
- TLV-TWA, Time weighted average
(based on up to a lO-hour exposure unless otherwise
noted) Concentration for a normal 8-hour workday and a
40-hour workweek to which nearly all workers may be
repeatedly exposed, day after day, without adverse
effect.
- TMRC, Theoretical maximum residue contribution
The amount of a substance that would be present in a 1.5
kg "average" daily diet if all commodities with
established tolerance bore residues at the tolerance
level. EPA assumes that (l) each pesticide is used on all
harvested crop acres for which a tolerance exists or is
proposed and (2) pesticide residues are present at full
tolerance levels in every food consumed.
- TMRL, Temporary maximum residue limit
(See MRL)
- Tolerance
A legal limit, currently established by EPA, for the
maximum amount of a pesticide residue which may be
present in or on a food.
- UCR, Unit cancer risk
The result of applying linear models to carcinogenicity
data to estimate the upper limit on lifetime risk per
unit of dose. Specific properties of substances are
generally not taken into account.
- UF, Uncertainty factor
A factor used in operationally deriving the RfD from
experimental data. UFs are intended to account for (l)
the variation in sensitivity among the members of the
human population, (2) the uncertainty in extrapolating
animal data to the case of humans, (3) the uncertainty in
extrapolating from data obtained in a study that is of
less than lifetime exposure, and (4) the uncertainty in
using LOAEL data rather than NOAEL data. Usually each of
these factors is set equal to 10.
II. COMPARISON OF EPA AND IARC CLASSIFICATION
SYSTEMS FOR EVIDENCE OF CARCINOGENICITY
A. Assessment of Evidence from
Human Studies:
EPA |
IARC |
1. Sufficient Evidence |
1. Sufficient Evidence |
2. Limited Evidence |
2. Limited Evidence |
3. Inadequate Evidence |
3. Inadequate Evidence |
4. No Data |
|
5. No Evidence |
|
B. Assessment of Evidence from
Experimental Animals:
EPA |
IARC |
1. Sufficient Evidence |
1. Sufficient Evidence |
2. Limited Evidence |
2. Limited Evidence |
3. Inadequate Evidence |
3. Inadequate evidence |
4. No Data |
4. Negative Evidence |
5. No Evidence |
5. No data |
C. Categorization of Evidence
for Human Carcinogenicity
EPA |
IARC |
1. Group A, Human Carcinogen |
1. Group 1, Carcinogenic for Humans |
2. Group B, Probable Human Carcinogen for Humans
- a. B1
- 1. Limited epidemiologic evidence
- 2. Sufficient animal studies
- b. B2
|
2. Group 2, Probably Carcinogenic
- a. 2A
- 1. Human evidence almost sufficient
- 2. Animal data sufficient
- b. 2B
|
3. Group C, Possible Human Carcinogen |
3. Group 3, Not Classfiable |
4. Group D, Not Classifiable |
|
5. Group E, Evidence of Non-carcinogenicity for
Humans |
|
DISCLAIMER: The information in
this brief does not in any way replace or supersede the
information on the pesticide product label and/or any regulatory
requirements. Please refer to the pesticide product label.